Thursday, March 22, 2012

ECOMP 6101: Impact Issues Group Seminar Project


Investigation, Activity, and Leadership

  • With the other members of your Issues Seminar Project team, you will investigate a topic and prepare a hands-on activity (or set of activities) on one impact issue. 
  • Prepare a one-page overview of the key points on your selected topic (one for the whole group). 
  • Submit a single annotated bibliography (from the group) with 3-5 sentence descriptions for each and dated no earlier than 2001.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Social Networking in Educational Settings
------------------------------------------------------------------

Overview:
Social networking has fast become a staple of communication for our emerging generation of students. For them, communicating through services such as Facebook, Twitter, and Skype are the preferred modes over services such as email. To this end, it is the responsibility of educators to not only be mindful of the role that this technology plays in our students everyday lives but also to teach them how to use it safely, securely, and in a fashion that is considered a positive contribution to the Internet and shows an understanding of digital citizenship.

A key point to social networking in educational settings is the potential to engage students on the topic of Internet safety. By using a social networking site, students are interacting with and contributing content to a location that is potentially “live” and accessible to anyone. Some educators may take issue with this depending on their grade level, school policies regarding posting student content online, and respecting the wishes of parents. As a result, some services have emerged, such as Edmodo, that offer teachers the look and feel of a traditional social networking service but with the added security and administrative control that can put teachers, administrators, and parents at ease.

Along with Edmodo, many educators have found useful ways in integrating social media into the classroom.  In New Jersey administration and educators are using facebook as the school homepage, cell phones to take quizzes, and twitter to update classroom assignments.  In Tucson, an educator is using Facebook to have his students educate local politicians and farmers on issues in the community.  Nikki Morrell in Florida is having her students use Twitter to analyze the Shakespearean play Hamlet.  All of these educators see the benefits in using social media in the classroom.  Morrell writes that it is time to accept the fact that we are living in a world where classrooms have no walls, and it is time for all educators to embrace this concept.  


Bibliography:
  • “Top Tech Buzzwords You Use But Can’t Define”
Fox, Z. (2012, March 16). [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2012/03/16/confusing-tech-buzzwords/
“Top Tech Buzzwords Everyone Uses but Don’t Quite Understand (2012)”
The two articles above address the issue of the constant emergence of vocabulary and “buzz words” that appear in social networking circles. Teachers need to be aware of the terminology that is being used within social networking systems so that they can educate students on their meaning and when to use them appropriately. This is an opportunity to integrate social networking with language arts.
  • “Mapping social media trends around the world”
Arno, C. (2012, March 16). [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://socialmediatoday.com/christian-arno/470898/mapping-social-media-trends-around-world
The article above could help introduce students and staff to the idea that there are many different types of social networking services based on geographic locations. Contrary to what students in the United States may think, Facebook is not the “go-to” social networking service in places like China, where they use a service called QZone. This article can act as a branching off point to talk about different types of social networks and highlight niche services like LinkedIn.
  • “10 Tips for Improved Security while using Social Media”
Mamidipudi, G. (2012, March 16). [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://socialmediatoday.com/gopykryshna/470740/10-tips-improved-security-while-using-social-media
The article above addressed a critical requirement to entering the social networking world: that of security and safety. The article proceeds to list ten tips that every social networking participant should be aware of, from password security to being selective about friend requests and even something as simply as logging out of the service when done. One of the goals of using social networking in the classroom is to teach students the skills and know-how to be safe and secure when they are on other services such as Twitter, Friendster, etc.
  • “63% of High School Students Want Textbooks that Communicate with Classmates”
This article discusses the trend being observed among students where they are asking for resources that are not only digital but have built-in opportunities to collaborate and socialize with classmates. If you look at the infographic included with the article, there is data ranging from how social networking is being used by younger and younger students, social networks are become a go-to place for college admissions to help them weed out applicants, and the estimated prevalence of bullying online. These statistics can be a branching off point for a variety of topics for classroom conversation and/or debate.
  • “18 Amazing Examples of G+ Hangouts in Education”
Marquis, J. (2012, March 12). [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://www.onlineuniversities.com/blog/2012/03/18-amazing-examples-of-g-hangouts-in-education/
This article addresses another type of social networking service built-in to Google’s service Google Plus. Called “hangouts” this service acts like a virtual coffee shot of sorts where individuals can gather and have virtual conversations. What really makes the article worthwhile is that it provides 18 examples of how this could be employed in the classroom from conducting Q&A sessions with a guest speaker to creating office hours for college students to speak with their professor to even conducting a conversation with the President (see #3). A common mantra for technology teachers and support staff is to not “reinvent the wheel.” This article follows this point of view by providing examples for teachers to either try or to help them construct their own ideas for integration.
  • “Ten Ways Schools Are Using Social Media Effectively”
This article discusses the results from a poll that eSchool News took of its readers. They posed the question “Name one way you use social networking your school/district. Or, if you can’t/don’t currently use social networking, how would you like to?” A sampling of the responses include social networking for professional development, assignments, communication, and assessments.

  • “Social Networking in Schools: Incentives for Participation”
This article bases its research on the results of three surveys conducted by the National School Board Association.  The surveys were issued to students, parents, and school district leaders in charge of Internet policy.  The results indicate that those surveyed expect that social networking could have a positive effect on student learning, however it is still not a prevalent tool that is used in schools. This article discusses the various reasons why its use is still not a reality in schools.

  • “Social Networking Goes to School”
Davis, M.  (2010, June 16).  Retrieved from
This article highlights the ways that educators are using social networking to positively impact student and teacher learning.  From social networking sites and tools such as Ning, Voicethread, Second Life, Skpe, Facebook and Twitter, schools are finding ways to engage 21st century thinkers and learners through social networking sites that foster group collaboration, global awareness and professional development.

  • “A Social Society:  The Positive Effects of Communicating through Social Networking Sites”
Wheeldon, E. (2010, April 25) Retrieved from
In this digital age, everything in our lives is spread out across as much media as possible, shaped by anyone and everyone.  This articles summarizes ways that social networking sites enhance communication in all aspects of life, from allowing people to form groups of similar interest, sharing ideas in a way where mobility is often a barrier to social interaction, to promoting education and news in a timely fashion.  
  • “Edmodo:  The Total Classroom Solution”
Byrne, R.  (2011, May 1)  Retrieved from
Come learn how safe social networking can be in an educational setting through Edmodo.  This facebook-like platform is a one stop shopping place for a teacher’s digital needs, including a place for teachers to assign and receive work, calendars to assist students with important dates, a digital library that serves as a “digital backpack” for teacher/ student files, a place to post messages and foster group collaboration, and parent connection features.  This Web 2.0 app also allows students to post educational videos or online projects to be commented on by their teachers and peers.

  • “Social Media in Education: The Power of Facebook”
Wolpert-Gawron., H. (2010, May 7). Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/social-media-education-examples-facebook 
This article looks at utilizing Facebook in the classroom to get the word out about the extinction of Bufflegrass.  Wolpert examines the multiple methods other educators have used to bring Facebook into their classrooms.  The article centers around the positive way Brien Kievit used Facebook to create an online learning community to spread the word about Bufflegrass.  The article ends with a plea from Wolpert to educators to use social media, especially Facebook to get a voice in society.  

  • “Social Media Find Place in Classroom”
Aurthor Eric Sheninger discusses a school in New Jersey making use of multiple social media tools in this article.  The teachers in this school in New Jersey use cell phones to answer questions.  Facebook has replaced the school website and twitter has become very popular for teachers to update class assignments.  The article discusses the fact that many students are coming to teachers bored and disconnected.  The article ends with the author stating that educators must incorporate social media, but it is also the educator’s responsibility to warn students of the dangers.  

  • “To Tweet or Not to Tweet”
Morrell, N. (2012, March 12) [web log message] Retrieved from http://www.edsocialmedia.com/2012/03/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/
This article/blog looks at an educator’s efforts to meet the needs of her students by embracing the concept “classroom with no walls.”  The blog describes Morrell’s effort to teach Hamlet using twitter to understand multiple themes.  The article states that twitter was used because Morrell wanted the students using higher order thinking skills, only being allowed to use 140 characters in twitter would allow for that.  Morrell ends by stating that her lessons were a success. Not only do her students “understand Hamlet, they love it”.



Tuesday, March 13, 2012

ECOMP 6101: Read/Watch/Think

We continue our tour of the landscape of the impact of technology on our culture, including our schools, by way of articles, talks, radio stories, and online videos. There are so many sources which means you should be able to find some things that particularly interest you. Select TWO articles (ONE of which is a TED Talk) from the link READ/WATCH/THINK list to read, watch, or listen to. Write up a short commentary on each of your selections.
 --------------------------------
Article #1: TED Talk: Sir Ken Robinson, “Schools Kill Creativity

Ken Robinson talks about creativity and how we are educating our students out of it and as a result are doing both them and our future a huge disservice. As examples, he refers to several stories about how young children have used creativity to help make sense of their world, from the 4-year-old who tried to understand what frankincense was to the little girl who was drawing a picture of God. If you look on YouTube, you will find dozens, if not thousands of other examples of children being similarly creative because, as Robinson puts forward, they not afraid to be wrong and take risks.

I see a lot what is talked about in this video resonating within my own sphere of education. The idea that taking risks is okay has become so foreign to our students at the middle school level, that the “risk-taker” component of our IB Learner Profile is constantly promoted and referred back to in our lessons and activities in an attempt to help them unlearn this fear of being wrong. At lunch, a common them I hear from the two 6th grade math teachers is that the Everyday Math program is so structured, so spelled out, so tight in its plan that it doesn’t leave any room for them to be creative. When I introduce to them an interactive math website that I think students would appreciate, their response is too often, “Thanks, this looks great, but I don’t have any room in the EM program to integrate it so that it will do any good.”

I think one of the reasons why education has shunned creativity is because it is not something that can be easily quantified or measured using some form of a standardized test. And, if something can’t be measured on a test then it get put on the back burner, shoved into the corner, or thrown out altogether with the bath water. How sad is that?

Finally, Robinson talks about several people who became quite famous as adults and asks us to think about them as children (e.g. Shakespeare at age 7). This part of the discussion caused me to ask the question, “What would the teachers of famous scholars, performers, innovators, etc. say about them as students?” It makes me wonder if, within the 22 students of my Day 4, Block 5 class there sits the next Albert Einstein or Amelia Earhart? And then I think, am I doing right by them as a teacher, as a guide to help them realize their talents? Obviously, there is no way for us to know what the future holds for our students. However, I think it is important for all of us to constantly ask the questions that Robinson asks in his presentation.


--------------------------------------

 Article #2: A Vision of K-12 Students Today

My first thought as I starting watching this video was, if these students are “digital natives” of the 21st century then why are they using dry-erase boards for their messages, a technology from the 20th century? Why are they using iPads? Granted, the iPad/eReader technology explosion hadn’t happened yet when this video was produced, but tablet technology did exist in 2007. I guess what I’m getting at is, I wonder what these students would have come up with had they been asked how they should communicate these words and phrases to the audience?

One of the slides in the presentation I have to take issue with. At approximately 3:13, the students ask us to let them use the World Wide Web Whatever, Whenever, Wherever. Having just completed a curriculum unit in our previous Lesley course on Internet Safety, I can’t say that I agree with this concept. Just because a student is a digital native or 21st century learner or “plugged in” doesn’t mean they know how to use technology and the Internet safely. I mean, we have adults who are apparently still lacking in some of these skills. Just look at the number of adults who have gotten themselves into trouble because of the choices they’ve made about posting content onto Facebook. Then again, perhaps these concerns were not as apparent in 2007 as I believe they are today.

In the end, I think this video shares a similar message with that of Ken Robinson’s presentation about the death of creativity. Students need to be free to be creative, take risks, and explore their potential. Teachers need to act as guides and help students nurture these skills in a safe and supportive environment, not to mention being allowed to be creative and take risks themselves. And administrators need to see the value in this approach and provide support to both students and teachers so that they can be successful, and one way they can achieve this is by being creative themselves.

Sunday, March 11, 2012

ECOMP 6101: School Profile


Do you know the “numbers” on your school? 

Please prepare a summary School Profile (your own, your children's, your community's; as appropriate)
including basic descriptive and factual information.


School: Middle School of the Kennebunks

Enrollment: 502
6th = 178
7th = 156
8th = 168

Student Body profile
The student population at MSK is mostly Caucasian (approximately 97%). The remaining three percent are made up of representatives from African American, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American heritage. Of the total number of students enrolled, approximately twenty percent have qualified for free/reduced lunch support. The student-to-teacher ratio is estimated at ten-to-one.

Teaching Staff
MSK employs a total of 47 full-time teaching staff, with an additional 82 staff employed in various rolls from Ed. Tech. to Food Services and Maintenance to Special Education personnel.

Test Scores
In looking at test scores from 2012 for the New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP), students at MSK scored the following:

  • In the area of mathematics, 80 to 85 precent of students in grades 6-8 met the standard.
  • In the area of reading, 86 to 89 precent of students in grades 6-8 met the standard.
  • In the area of writing, 62 percent of students in grade 8 met the standard. No results were available for students in grades 6 and 7.


In looking at test scores from the Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA), students at MSK scored the following:

  • Students in grades 6/7 made improvements in both those who met the requirements and the number of students who showed growth between 2009-2010 in the area of reading. Students in grade 8 showed a decrease in both meeting requirements and showing improvement.
  • In the area of mathematics, students in grade 6/7 showed improvement in their growth between 2009-2010, but showed a decline in the number of students who met their target scores. Students in grade 8 showed improvement in both categories.


Instructional Technology Resources
MSK is equipped with two general purpose computer labs and a third Special Education computer lab; all three are outfitted with Apple iMac computers. Each 6th grade classroom is outfitted with an interactive whiteboard (i.e. SMART Board) including all three computer labs, five special education rooms, and the main library.

Each full-time teacher in grades 7/8 has access to a Apple MacBook via the Maine Learning Technology Initiative (MLTI); teachers in grade six also have MLTI laptops purchased through the state laptop program. The ratio of students to laptops in grades 7/8 is 1-to-1 as a result of the MLTI program. The entire school building is equipped with a WiFi network, which is also provided by the state via the MLTI program. Through a grant, the 6th grade is equipped with two mobile labs in an attempt to bring the entire school closer to a 1-to-1 laptop environment for students across all three grades.

Student computer use at home
It is estimated that about 85 percent of the student population across the district has access to a computer or electronic device at home. This figure is partially inflated due to the presence of the MLTI program in that one of its goals is to provide both students and parents at the middle school level with access to a WiFi-enabled laptop computer capable of accessing the Internet. Students who qualify for the free/reduced lunch program may also qualify for Internet access at a reduced rate through Great Works Internet (GWI). The state program will also provide students with a modem to connect the state laptop to this service.



Why are numbers significant to know and what do yours show?

These numbers are significant because they help paint a picture of the overall population that the school is serving. Student body and staff profiles help to determine what kind of teaching and learning environments are possible and if the current status is even sustainable. Testing numbers can give insight into how effective school instruction and assessment is with respect to student learning and comprehension, although often administrators and/or school boards can add more weight to these numbers than what is appropriate or realistic. Instructional technology numbers can expose inequalities in access across grade levels and schools. For example, when a new elementary school was built in Kennebunk every Kindergarten through third grade classroom was outfitted with an interactive whiteboard. While this was a huge innovation and step forward in technology integration for the students and staff, it created inequity with the elementary school population in Kennebunkport. Hence, the school district spent the next two years devoting budgetary funds to install similar technology until the Kennebunkport school was on par with the new school.


Bibliography

Regional School Unit 21 (2012). March 6, 2012. http://www.rsu21.net


ZipSkinny (2005). March 6, 2012. http://www.zipskinny.com/index.php?zip=04043





ECOMP 6101: Making Change Follow Up

The intent here is to link the simulation exercise directly to you, and to your experience. Think about the adopter types and the chart on levels of use of innovation (also found under Lab Activities under Making Change Simulation) to reflect on your own experience. BRIEFLY answer the following questions and post your answers on the Discussion board in the designated area. There is a table attached here to also help organize your thinking.

------------------------------------

1. Where were you on levels of use of technology two years ago? 

Two years ago I was two years into my new roll as a technology integrator at the middle school and witnessing the decline and eventual demise of our 21st Century Classroom program due to a lack of funding. I was overseeing the deployment of “Round III” of the MLTI 1-to-1 laptop program and continuing to develop my computer literacy course with little to no input or feedback from the administration with respect to curriculum.

Upon reflection, I find that my level of technology use leapfrogs all over the place, depending on which aspect of my job I focus on. I was in the mechanical stage with respect to the 21st C.C. program due to the decline in support from the administration and growing discontent and lack of interest from teachers in the program. If I look at the MLTI program, I think I had a foot in the refinement level as I was overseeing the initial deployment of new technologies and I wanted the transition to be smooth and successful for both students and staff. I wanted them to know what new tools they were going to have at their fingertips and how to successfully integrate them into their teaching and learning. Upon reflecting on my teaching through my computer literacy course, I think I was finally moving into the integration level as I wanted to make deliberate connections between the content I was teaching and the projects students were being asked to create in their other classes. 

2. Where on this scheme are you now? 

Today, while they have changed my job title from integrator to coordinator, I feel that I have been able to maintain a strong presence in the refinement and integration levels. From time-to-time I am able to get a foot (perhaps only a toe) into the renewal stage as I try to find alternatives to achieving goals by way of integrating new technologies. However, each time a new technology comes along I revert back to the orientation level in order to define what this new innovation is, how it could be integrated, and where could I coordinate its introduction into the classroom.

Where on the chart do you see yourself when you finish your degree program?

I don’t see myself really changing where I am when I finish this degree program. I think by the very nature of being an integrator/coordinator of technology, you have to have the flexibility to travel up and down the levels in order to be successful. However, my hope is that in the future I will be able to motivate students and staff to make these treks with me and collaborate at each level, thereby developing concrete and worthwhile strategies for technology integration and innovation.

Saturday, March 10, 2012

ECOMP 6101: Making Change-The Game


Simulation Game: Making Change
Simulates organizational change in educational setting - training exercise not technology per se but the process of getting colleagues to do something differently. 


The simulation is based on real findings in educational research and the situation is based on real people.


You will work as a team, assuming the role of a change committee. Your objective is to do various activities to influence people who are represented on the game-board. 


The game-board represents a school district – on one axis are the names of people you want to exert influence on (the players) and across the top of the board are the phases people go thru adopting any new practice - or levels of use the players move through.

The winning team and their game-board :-)

Friday, March 9, 2012

ECOMP 6101: Book Reflection

Taking Charge of Change - Chapter 5
[Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., Huling, L., & Hall, G. E. (2006). Taking charge of change. Austin: SEDL.]



Thursday, March 1, 2012

ECOMP 6106: Curriculum Unit Website


What is the purpose for creating a teaching website?

Your website should be designed to provide you and others (i.e. parents and/or students, other teachers, administrators, and colleagues with whom you collaborate) with access to information and documents that are part of the unit you will be designing during this course. Websites provide easy access to materials, hyperlinks, online resources, and assessment documents. Your website should become a compendium of information and resources for your curriculum unit. Plan your website to make use of the power of the Internet to assist with the storage, retrieval, and communication of information and documents.

Teaching Website: Internet Safety
Table of Contents:

  • Introduction
  • Unit Goals
  • Unit Questions
  • Assessment Plan
  • Unit Resources
  • Instructional Procedures
    • Introduction
    • Cyberbullying
    • Digital Footprint
    • Internet Credibility
    • Phishing
    • Viruses
    • Conclusion
  • Technology Integration
  • Differentiated Instruction
  • Communication